← All case studies
Live implementationFraud Scoring

Online loan fraud cut from 48% to zero, without auto-declining anyone.

US consumer lender · 6-week proof of concept · 394 applications · client-reported

48% → 3%fraud rate with AI scoringReported
0%with human review closing the gapReported
6 weeksproof of conceptReported
01
The problem

A US consumer lender was losing money to fraudulent online loan applications, which were being caught only after approval or funding.

£What it was costing them

Direct fraud losses plus investigation, recovery and compliance cost on every case.

02
The existing workflow

How the work was done, and where it broke.

✕

Nearly half of online applications in the sample were fraudulent.

✕

Fraud was found after approval or funding, once money had moved.

✕

Stopping it had to happen without blocking genuine customers.

03
The solution

The model scores; a person decides. Nobody is auto-declined.

1Scored every application

A 0 to 1 risk score with reasons, from 650+ behavioural signals.

2Routed by risk

Low risk fast-tracked with sampled audit; medium to a reviewer; high to compliance.

3Kept people deciding

Nobody is auto-declined. Every decision is logged.

4Learned safely

Drift is monitored, and a retrained model is promoted only if it beats the last one.

04
Architecture

From input to outcome.

1

Inputs

  • Online loan applications
  • Applicant behaviour signals
2

Features

  • 650+ behavioural signals per application
3

Models

  • Supervised fraud model
  • Anomaly detector
  • 0 to 1 risk score with reasons
4

Routing

  • Low risk: fast track with sampled audit
  • Medium: reviewer
  • High: compliance
5

Human review

  • People decide; nobody is auto-declined
  • Every decision logged
6

Monitoring

  • Drift monitored
  • New model promoted only if it beats the last
05
Integrations

Works with the systems already in place.

⇄

Loan application system

⇄

Case management for reviewers

06
Business value

What changed for the business.

48% → 3%Reported

Fraud rate on online applications with AI scoring.

3% → 0%Reported

Human review closed the remaining gap.

Genuine customers servedReported

No one is declined by the model alone.

Reviewers focusedReported

Effort goes to the applications that need it.

What it could be worthIllustrative
$5.38Mtrue cost before AI
$0.34Mwith AI scoring
$5.04Mtrue cost avoided
How we worked this out

Industry research (LexisNexis True Cost of Fraud, 2025) puts the total cost to US lenders at $5.38 for every $1 of fraud lost. Per $1M of direct fraud loss at the 48% baseline: Illustrative. The multiplier is a US figure; we validate it for the UK market.

07
The evidence

Shown on real work.

Across 394 online applications in a 6-week proof of concept, AI scoring brought fraud from 48% to 3%, and human review brought it to 0%.
About the evidence

Client-reported results from a 6-week proof of concept on 394 applications.

How we label results

Have a process like this?

Tell us about it. The first discovery call is free.